marius borg høiby nakenbilde sorted by

relevance

Personally I would have found it more natural if membership of the royal family were restricted to those with a royal title.

I don't think we should contribute to the endless speculation that the tabloid press perpetuates in Norway and should leave the matter alone, as it has - at least at the moment - no political or constitutional relevance.

iby nakenbilde there is no constitutional limit to to whom the King can extend membership of the royal family.

However, the official list of members of the royal family appear in the State Almanach, which gives the same information as I directed you to on the royal website.

No, it is not established by law who is a member of the royal family or not.

A person born to two non-royal parents, who has also not married a royal, is not a royal.

On the other hand there is no constitutional limit to to whom the King can extend membership of the royal family.

Some of them have been corrected after I have made them aware of the facts, but now I have given up.

It is established by law who is a royal in Norway and who is not.

It is highly unlikely that the King will ever give him any noble title, and it seems clear that the royal family prepares him for a normal civilian life for the future.